Am Montag, 15. Juni 2009 17:47:32 schrieb Norman Franke:
> FWIW, I'm quite happy with Prototype. I'd vote we use developer cycles
> for something more productive than dealing with library preferences.
The good news first: Tapestry is opensource. That's why users who see the need
of a jQuery integration are able to jump in and do the work.
The bad news: I don't think they will spend their time on features that are
not on their personal "need" list.
> They are largely functionally equivalent and prototype support is
> already done.
At the core you are able to do the same things. But looking at the available
plugins and third party integrations jQuery is light years ahead. Maybe we
would see way more components for tapestry if they could be build with jquery.
Piero
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
