> > Of course this cannot work for frameworks like Tapestry, since they are > > bound to license-restrictions regarding distribution. > > Tapestry's license is Apache version 2, so I don't think there's any > problem regarding its distribution.
I know, I actually meant the other way around :o) I don't have a problem, but Tapesty may get into trouble if it included everything in the SVN repository like I said, since 3rd party libraries might place more restrictions on redistribution (GPL license for example). Then again.... IANAL. regards, Onno
