Em Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:05:03 -0200, Piero Sartini <p...@sartini-its.com>
escreveu:
That's what I meant with re-inventing the wheel ;-)
You're right. :)
There are already lots of working implementations of JavaEE
persistence.... but every single web framework needs to build one
implementation of its own, simulating the specification. Maybe I am
the only one, but I find this is lost developer power that should be
used to make the web parts of these frameworks better...
Maybe we could use some light EJB 3.x implementation integrated with
Tapestry-IoC (EJB-defined beans injectable as Tapestry-IoC services). This
is something that will be done eventually.
I've never used EJB, so I don't know what's the necessary effort to do
that.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, software architect and developer, Ars Machina Tecnologia da
Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
