Thanks Vangel, that's very helpful information.  Best of luck with your upgrade.

Anyone else have experiences to share?

Regards,
Jim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vangel V. Ajanovski [mailto:a...@ii.edu.mk] 
Sent: 22 May 2010 10:55
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: > 5.1.0.5 in production anywhere?

On 05/22/2010 10:16 AM, Jim O'Callaghan wrote:
> Is anyone using a version newer than 5.1.0.5 in production for their
> application?  There are a few nice to have more recent additions that would
> be useful in our application but it would be interesting to hear first-hand
> experience of any stability issues.
>   
I intend to run the latest version of our app build arround the latest
5.2.0-SNAPSHOT in production from next week with a selected group of a
200-300 users, but at this moment there is just one small bug that stops
me that I should try to fix, for which I am not sure if it is a problem
with our application or with Tapestry, and I don't yet have the time to
check.

In BeanEditForm one should not "add" properties that already exist. But
when such properties are not atomic like string or int, for example a
property I have is of the class FacilityType, they are not visible. Of
course they are not because Tapestry does not know how to show them and
you have to create a "parameter" block to specifiy how to display them.
But this is not enough for some pages, and is enough for others in our
version with 5.2.0-snapshot. Under 5.1.0.5 it was all ok. In 5.2.0 i
have to "add" these properties alhough they already exist. But when I
"add" them, then Tapestry only runs OK for the first time I submit the
form. The next time I open the same page Tapestry complains that the
property already exists in the model, but after a refresh in the browser
everything seems normal and you can continue working. On the other hand
there are other pages where I am not forced to "add" the already
existing property and the "parameter" block is enough. This is just a
first report and I am not yet sure if this is a problem with Tapestry or
with how our pages are built. But since it's not a stopper bug, and you
can continue working after a refresh, it is down the priority for us at
this moment and I will not try to find it and state the nature til I am
sure and that will happen only after several days.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to