Hi, guys!
I stand corrected. :)
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:13:44 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Thank you for pointing that out. I guess that the meaning has
changed, it's more like "the page's persistent fields have been
attached to the page instance for this thread/request".
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Igor Drobiazko
<igor.drobia...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
@PageDetached are ignored in Tapestry 5.2, as it doesn't use a page
pool
anymore.
That's not correct. The life cycle of a page is still the same: the
page is
attached to the request and detached when the request is served.
--
Best regards,
Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java, Tapestry e Hibernate
Coordenador e professor da Especialização em Engenharia de Software com
Ênfase em Java da Faculdade Pitágoras
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
