Hi Thiago,

The biggest T5 project we have isn't really a CMS.  We have data entry
wizards (say, ~10 pages/wizard) that the user steps through.  Each
page is pretty much defined as far as navigation/data goes (and each
one sits in a common layout), but our customer every now and then
calls up and wants the wording/spacing/etc tweaked on a page.  There
is only so much CSS in a database can do for this scenario.  In these
cases we update the TML and redeploy the application and they don't
like the downtime.

So, that's the scenario behind my thoughts of having the TML in the
database.  For simple tweaks it might be nice.  I realize there are
other issues (have to expire the page pool, versioning control, etc).
Just a thought I'm kicking around.  :-)

Thanks,

mrg


On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I really don't think it's good idea to use Tapestry templates as a CMS
> instead of using Tapestry to implement a CMS with some templating language
> meant to be used by non-programmers. I hope this isn't what Michael wants .
> . .

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to