Oh yes! I can remember about that: but the link is not working, the web site seems down
Il 24/11/2010 10.27, Igor Drobiazko ha scritto: > Maybe this presentation will be interesting for the jsf developer. > > http://blog.tapestry5.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/JSF-2.0-vs-Tapestry-5.pdf > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Ivano Luberti <lube...@archicoop.it>wrote: > >> I forward to the list what a jsf developer has written to me: I'm >> working with him on a project where he has to develop the web >> application and I'm working on a web service consumed by his web >> application. >> >> I had forwarded to him a message by Thiago that was trying to point out >> differences between T5 and JSF. >> The interesting thing he has to say is about facelets as a way to use >> standard XHTML templates inside JSF. >> Also the difficulty to use together different component sets is >> interesting: reminds me of the issue with different JavaScript >> components in T5. >> >> But what really surprises me is the similarity he found between struts >> and JSF >> >> >> -------- Messaggio originale -------- >> >> Hi Ivano, >> >> We do indeed use JSF for our web development and more specifically we >> use Icefaces which is a set of AJAX enabled components and AJAX push >> framework which sits on top of JSF. We chose to use JSF because it >> wasn't too dissimilar from Struts which we were using before. Generally >> we find it very good although it does have some shortcomings but they >> don't tend to get in the way too much. We are using JSF 1.2 but JSF 2.0 >> is now available and adds support for some of the things on your list >> such as, you can now use annotations for lots of things you use to have >> to use XML for, there is also the addition of page level scope as per >> the tapestry idea. One point the tapestry guy is wrong about though is >> that with JSF you don't have to use JSP, that is only one option. We use >> facelets which is now part of the JSF 2.0 spec so if you use that you >> code directly in XHTML using the relevant faces tags, thus the problems >> that came from using JSP as a display layer disappear. >> >> With JSF you get a choice of which component set you want to use, or I >> believe you can use multiple but then configuration becomes more >> challenging. We looked at a number including Richfaces and Woodstock and >> decided that Icefaces offered the best set of components. All three of >> those are open source though so are completely free to use, although >> support is available too. >> >> Unfortunately I don't know a great deal about tapestry so I can't really >> say how it compares to JSF, I think you'd have to evaluate them both and >> decide which one is easier for you to work with based on your previous >> experience. >> >> Hope that helps, >> Darren >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > -- ================================================== dott. Ivano Mario Luberti Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l. Sede Operativa Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa tel.: +39-050- 580959 tel/fax: +39-050-9711344 web: www.archicoop.it ================================================== --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
