On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:38:17 -0200, Wechsung, Wulf <[email protected]>
wrote:
Besides the issue of what the spec really means by "not significant" (I
strongly suspect it means for validity only), I really don't understand
what's behind that statement. I mean, every XML parser simply parses
text.
But attributes are not text: they're more metadata than data. As attribute
names must be unique inside an element, order doesn't provide any
additional information.
email, in this regard I think the XML spec (or the parser makers
interpretation) is broken.
Try convincing W3C about it. :)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
