I would say it's better to favor better functionality rather than backwards compatibility in this case.
On Dec 14, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > We are currently caught between the wrong technology (PrototypeJS) and > the need for backwards compatibility. I'm not sure how that will play > out in 5.4 but it will (finally!) be addressed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
