On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:49:05 -0200, René Bernhardsgrütter
<rene.bernhardsgruet...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Thiago,
Hi!
thank you for your answer!
;)
I thought that Java/Tomcat wouldn't be optimal to handle large/many file
transfers in a web environment (too high cpu usage) and that Apache
would handle it better -- correct me, if I'm wrong.
I wouldn't say that. File transfers are affected by IO, not CPU.
I've now implemented the StreamResponse solution you suggested and it
works fine.
I'd like to see how you implemented it.
Anyway, I'll see if the performance will be a problem.
That's exactly how you should do: instead of just guessing how it'll
perform, implement and test. :)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
