I was thinking about that but never tried as it doesn't seem intuitive
at all :) But thanks for the hint, I will refactor.
Adam
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Cezary Biernacki <cezary...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can do:
>
> jsSupport.require("foo").invoke("myFunc").with("bar");
>
> Best regards,
> Cezary
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Adam X <vbgnm3c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a reason this is not a fluid setter? Right now I have to do:
>>
>> Initialization foo = jsSupport.require("foo");
>> foo.with("bar");
>> foo.invoke("myFunc");
>>
>> I'd rather just do:
>>
>> jsSupport.require("foo").with("bar").invoke("myFunc")
>>
>>
>> but with(Object...) returns void :(
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
