On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:03 AM Chris Poulsen <mailingl...@nesluop.dk> wrote:
> Hi > Hello! > I've just gotten around to test our products against Tapestry 5.5 > (master/HEAD) - Everything seems to work fine with the latest code, good > work! > Thanks for the info! > Would it be possible to get a tagged beta (or rc) version published to some > repository that we can rely on for stable builds? > I can see several 5.4 beta/rc versions in central ( > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tapestry/tapestry-core ), > that would work well for us. I can see a single 5.4-beta on apache staging, > but it seems unclear how long we can expect things to be present in > "staging". > Unless we delete the betas, I'd expect them to be present mostly forever. > > -- > Chris > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:43 AM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo < > thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've just committed a fix for this issue. > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:35 PM Oliver Kaiser <oliver.kai...@eddyson.de> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > given something like this: > > > > > > public interface Blub { > > > public default String foo() { > > > return "Default"; > > > } > > > } > > > public class BlubImpl implements Blub { > > > @Override > > > public String foo() { > > > return "Impl"; > > > } > > > } > > > > > > when calling "registry.getService(Blub.class).foo()" using beta-1 this > > > works as expected (BlubImpl is called); when using beta-2 only the > > > default method is called. > > > > > > the log output of PlasticProxyFactory shows that the method is skipped > > > in the generated class > > > > > > seems to be related to this commit > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tapestry-5/commit/709d282bfc626ce55cde07cbf909c0b86c2b4bcb#diff-89a017b694cffee07e15608bc316d0d7 > > > > > > now "proxyInterface(Class, PlasticMethod)" only > > > calls "introduceInterface(Class, PasticMethod)" (which skips the method > > > as "isDefaultMethod(m)" returns true); earlier versions had an > > > additional for-loop which handled this case (at least from stepping > > > though in a debugger it looks that way) > > > > > > > > > that's a regression, right? > > > > > > > > > btw: thanks to everyone who worked on the 5.4->5.5 transition; updating > > > was very smooth! > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Oliver > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thiago > > > -- Thiago
