On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/10/13 Johannes Kuhs <[email protected]>: >> Yes, the lists inheritance is great and using it would definitely >> work. However, I would need to implement lists for all attributes in >> order to keep the application flexible enough to handle inheritance >> when needed without having to make changes to the Tiles definition. I >> was hoping for a more elegant solution that somehow works with normal >> (non-list) attributes. > > In fact there is another option. > Instead of putting a simple JSP as an attribute, put a definition that > inserts a list of attributes, as mentioned in the previous e-mail. > Do you think it is "elegant" enough? :-D > > Antonio >
Hi Antonio, Sorry for the late reply. I'm not sure how your suggested solution would look like. Could you give me an example? My goal is to have a "universal" way to inherit and extend the value/content of an existing attribute. Thank you for all your help!
