I am sorry - I forgot to mention that tiles 2.0.5 Thanks for replying.
________________________________ From: Antonio Petrelli <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, June 11, 2010 10:36:57 AM Subject: Re: tile definitions correct?! What version of Tiles are you using? Antonio 2010/6/11 Despot Jakimovski <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I want to reuse some tiles definitions in the following way: > basicLayout consists of header body and footer > bodyLayout consists of menu and content tile > example page should extend the basic layout but override the content tile. > I thought that this could solve my problem: > > <definition name="basicTemplate" > template="/WEB-INF/tiles/basicTemplate.jsp"> > <put-attribute name="headTile" value="/WEB-INF/tiles/headTile.jsp" /> > <put-attribute name="headerTile" value="/WEB-INF/tiles/headerTile.jsp" /> > <put-attribute name="bodyTileAbstract" value="bodyTemplate" /> > <put-attribute name="footerTile" value="/WEB-INF/tiles/footerTile.jsp" /> > </definition> > <definition name="bodyTemplate" template="/WEB-INF/tiles/bodyTile.jsp"> > <put-attribute name="menuTile" value="/WEB-INF/tiles/menuTile.jsp"/> > <put-attribute name="contentTileAbstract" > value="/WEB-INF/tiles/contentTileAbstract.jsp"/> > </definition> > <definition name="example" extends="basicTemplate"> > <put-attribute name="contentTileAbstract" > value="/WEB-INF/jsp/home.jsp"/> > </definition> > > instead, I never get the home.jsp as the content tile. Am I wrong to defining > the definitions in this way? > > Kind Regards, > Deksa > > >
