Antonio Petrelli-3 wrote: > > If you are using Tiles 2.2.x, you can use native Freemarker support: > http://tiles.apache.org/framework/tutorial/integration/freemarker.html >
I'm using native freemarker support. In this case this line in the freemarker layout.ftl template isn't necessary? <#assign tiles=JspTaglibs["http://tiles.apache.org/tags-tiles"]> Antonio Petrelli-3 wrote: > > The TilesInitializerServlet does not need a servlet mapping. The > Freemarker servlet needs to be mappend, for example, to *.ftl URLs. > I have removed the TilesInitializerServlet mapping and I have changed the Freemarker to *.ftl Antonio Petrelli-3 wrote: > > Please do not write in all capitals, it is considered rude. > Anyway > I apologize for being rude, I didn't know capital letters were rude. Antonio Petrelli-3 wrote: > > I don't recommend JSP anyway, choose what you prefer. > Why? What makes freemarker better? Antonio Petrelli-3 wrote: > > I must confess that the best MVC integration with Tiles is with Spring > MVC > I decided to use Struts 2 MVC because I like the way the view components it has can be used and extended, in Spring MVC I would have to create components from the start. Nevertheless, I'm using Spring with transaction management, dependency injection or IoC and AOP -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Struts-2-Tiles-2-Freemarker-Integration-tp29297517p29307089.html Sent from the tiles users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
