> Thanks for the quick response! Tiles 3 is labelled beta on the tiles > website which is why I had avoided it...
it would be great if i could convince you the pros of our focus on tiles-3 outweighs any cons of our "beta" label of it. > also looking just now it seems > that Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 is required for it? indeed, i could have read your first msg a little more careful. I'm a little confused on this front. According to TILES-270 we upgraded to Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 with tiles-2.1 and according to TILES-447 we dropped support for it in tiles-2.2 ~mck
