> Is there a way from within a preparer to get the name of the definition that > is being prepared?
No. Do you really need the name of the definition? (it can be a failure to do IoC correctly). You can add a string attribute into the definition (matching the definition name) if you really need the definition name. ~mck -- "Claiming Java is easier than C++ is like saying that K2 is shorter than Everest." Larry O'Brien | http://github.com/finn-no | http://tech.finn.no |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
