Definitely. -Terence M. Bandoian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >That is correct. However, it's much better not to do this since it >wastes a lot of bandwidth by sending the CSS code with every page. >Much better to use <link...> and let the browser cache the file >instead. > >Yaakov. > >On 11/16/05, Terence M. Bandoian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hi- >> >>In some cases, it may be desirable to include CSS or JavaScript files so >>that they are delivered in-line. For example: >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] file="styles/style.css" %> >>or >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] file="styles/style.css.jspf" %> >> >>Unless I'm mistaken, JSP tags in files included in this manner should be >>processed regardless of the file extension. >> >>-Terence M. Bandoian >> >>P.S. My apologies for the previous reply. >> >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>Hello, >>>>> >>>>>how can I define, that e.g. the extension .css shall be processed by >>>>> >>>>> >>tomcat same as a .jsp-file? >> >> >>>>>Regards >>>>>Marten >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
