I would agree with Chuck - Tomcat standalone has been a far better and
robust solution for since 5.0.18 was released  - and hoping it will improve
(actually am sure it will) with 5.5.x!

I did use TC 3 and 4 with Apache - which was never ideal or stable (maybe my
fault that) - but TC 5+ is really great!

Regards,

Carl

-----Original Message-----
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 13 December 2005 18:10
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: setup for web designers?

> From: JT Neville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: setup for web designers?
> 
> >>From what I have read, you get better performance if you let tomcat 
> >>serve the static stuff as well as the jsps
> 
> I've been running Tomcat for three years now, and I have to disagree.  
> In my experience, Tomcat isn't as robust at serving the static content 
> as other old school webserver daemons.

Offering performance advice based on a 3-year old Tomcat is highly
inappropriate.  The 5.5.12 version delivers static content at essentially
the same speed as Apache httpd.  Suggested reading (note that this is about
5.5.4, and 5.5.12 is yet faster):
http://tomcat.apache.org/articles/benchmark_summary.pdf

 - Chuck


THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
attachments from all computers.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to