[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I really couldn't care less whether the content-length header is > different. The important thing here is what is in the logs.
No, it's not; the important thing is whether there's any applicable spec that (even indirectly) requires the container to generate the exact same response body (to be discarded rather than returned) for a HEAD request as for a GET. > When you tested it, do you get a "FOO:[...]" line in your logs (that > corresponds to the HEAD request)? > Does it have something between the '[' and ']'? No. But I wouldn't have *any* expectations of an ambiguous situation. Out of curiousity, have you tried this with any different containers (Jetty, Resin, JRun, ...)? > The problem is that I _am_ getting a line like that, which implies > that tomcat runs the jsp page, but there is nothing between the brackets. > You can't see in the test case that I sent, but this causes all sorts of > problems if you have code that tries to use the data that c:import > supposedly loads. It sounds like a problem to develop an app based on behavior that's not required by any spec (or handled totally by your own code). :-) FWIW! -- Hassan Schroeder ----------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
