### "Peter Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote message to "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> ### ### this is reply for: RE: Tomcat integegrated with Apache ### > > From: Rafal Zawadzki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Why not use squid? > > One view: Why go through another user-level process when you can simply > redirect the socket connections via iptables for fewer CPU cycles and > less RAM? > > Another view: squid may be faster at serving static content, so > interposing it could be useful if you suspect that is a bottleneck. > Recent Tomcats are faster than older Tomcats at serving static content. > > My view: It depends on your mix of content and your webapp. In general, > it's not possible to know which is more efficient *in your environment* > without benchmarking it.
Hm, sorry, my fault. I never think about small tomcat webapps. I've got experience only with big clustered applications, so I always think about this trio: - tomcat - apache - squid -- Rafał Zawadzki Deploy/Release Manager eo Networks Sp. z o.o.
pgpL3EoFSqqHE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
