Chris Mooring wrote:
Hi All,
I have just read various configuration documents for jk2 and jk. It seems as
though support for jk2 is no longer available.
Is jk the recommended connector to use now? It seems odd...like I am using a
previous version.
Right, use jk. In month or so it will be renamed to jk3 so all the
oddity will be lost :)
Also, I'd still love to hear from anyone about my previous question on
whether Tomcat's native HTTP server is a better option than using a setup
such as IIS or Apache and a connector like JK. See my previous e-mail pasted
below;
If you don't need a special things from native web server, then using
Tomcat Native will give you much higher performance if you
compare native web server and Tomcat.
Just as an example for ab –n 500000 –c xx localhost:// (1k file)
Tomcat + Native: 14600 req/sec
Apache 2.0.54 : 9200 req/sec
What's interesting is that you can replicate that by yourself :)
Regards,
Mladen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
