Thanks for the replies. > : Where are you getting this 20 connection count from? Those must be > : currently open connections to clients?
Actually, I am talking about connector (Http Connector) instead of connection. > To the Chris, I personally don't think it is the norm since your average > site usually don't get that kind of load. I would start with 2 or 3 and > scale up as needed. I have gotten request to separate traffic to multiple ports so that Network Engineer can manage/debug network traffic easier (by port). I totally agree this will make troubleshooting easier, but I am also afraid there is performance cost in implementing this. The tomcat instance could get very busy some times with only 1 connector. (3k+ requests every minute) Therefore, I am wondering once I starts having 20 connectors (listening on 20 different ports), will the performance be affected by a lot. Thanks, --Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:52 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: overheads on multiple connectors > > : From: "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > : On 3/21/06, Chris Fong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : > Let me rephrase original my question. > : > > : > Is it an abnormal configuration to have roughly 20 connectors all > : > listening on different ports for 5.5.15? Have anyone had similar > : > configuration for their production environment with heavy traffic? > : > : You're going to have to clarify your question. You should only see > : Tomcat listening on a couple (2-3) of ports at any time depending on > : your connector setup. One for Tomcat administration (shutdown, by > : default port 8005), One for HTTP (by default port 8080) and another > : for AJP (by default port 8009 if configured). > : > : Where are you getting this 20 connection count from? Those must be > : currently open connections to clients? > > Well, it is possible to configure multiple AJP connectors, each listening > on a different port. It typically is used with JK2 workers and/or a load > balancer. > > To the Chris, I personally don't think it is the norm since your average > site usually don't get that kind of load. I would start with 2 or 3 and > scale > up as needed. > > Long > www.edgesoft.ca --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
