Thanks a lot Dan. I will do. I just hope all internet visitors will still
be able to browse by site. Do you think they will? How important could the
CBC ciphers be?



On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Dan Chernoff <dan.chern...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Your only other real option is remove any CBC and diffehelmen ciphers from
> your supported cipher list. This really only leaves you with RC4 ciphers.
>
> Dan
>
> On Sep 14, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Brian Braun <brianbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your response!
> > Contacting them will not work. I have had false positives in the past and
> > they just don't fix it. I need to do something on my side to solve this
> > situation.
> > I'm certainly NOT using OpenSSL. I'm using a Geotrust certificate, and
> > therefore the JSSE implementation.
> > Is there any other value I could give to the parameters in my "connector"
> > section to solve this problem? Maybe any way to force TLS1.1 instead of
> > allow TLS1.0? I'm very confussed.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Dan <dan.chern...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I experienced this exact same issue with McAfee secure scan. If you are
> you
> >> using JSSE as your provider you should be okay. You can submit this as a
> >> false positive scan and let them know you are using JSSE instead of
> >> OpenSSL.
> >>
> >>
> >> You can check to see which provider you are using by looking at your
> >> connector.
> >>
> >> JSSE
> >> <Connector protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol"
> port="443"
> >> .../>
> >>
> >> APR/OpenSSL
> >> <Connector protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol"
> port="443"
> >> .../>
> >>
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Brian Braun [mailto:brianbr...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 1:06 AM
> >> To: Tomcat Users List
> >> Subject: SSL Vulnerability in Tomcat and/or JVM?
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> In my site I'm using a certificate from www.securitymetrics.com. Today
> >> they
> >> disabled my certificate. This is supposed to be the main reason:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Description: SSL/TLS Protocol Initialization Vector Implementation
> >> Information Disclosure Vulnerability Synoposis: It may be possible to
> >> obtain
> >> sensitive information from the remote host with SSL/TLS-enabled
> services.
> >> Impact: A vulnerability exists in SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 that could allow
> >> information disclosure if an attacker intercepts encrypted traffic
> served
> >> from an affected system. TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, and all cipher suites that do
> >> not
> >> use CBC mode are not affected. This script tries to establish an SSL/TLS
> >> remote connection using an affected SSL version and cipher suite, and
> then
> >> solicits return data. If returned application data is not fragmented
> with
> >> an
> >> empty or one-byte record, it is likely vulnerable.
> >> OpenSSL uses empty fragments as a countermeasure unless the
> >> 'SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS' option is specified when OpenSSL is
> >> initialized. Microsoft implemented one-byte fragments as a
> countermeasure,
> >> and the setting can be controlled via the registry key H
> >> KEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\System\\CurrentControlSet\\Control\\SecurityProviders
> >> \\SCHANNEL\\SendExtraRecord <file://schannel/SendExtraRecord>.
> Therefore,
> >> if
> >> multiple applications use the same SSL/TLS implementation, some may be
> >> vulnerable while others may not, depending on whether or not a
> >> countermeasure has been enabled. Note that this script detects the
> >> vulnerability in the SSLv3/TLSv1 protocol implemented in the server. It
> >> does
> >> not detect the BEAST attack where it exploits the vulnerability at HTTPS
> >> client-side (i.e., Internet browser). The detection at server-side does
> not
> >> necessarily mean your server is vulnerable to the BEAST attack because
> the
> >> attack exploits the vulnerability at client-side, and both SSL/TLS
> clients
> >> and servers can independently employ the split record countermeasure.
> See
> >> also : http://www.openssl.org/~bodo/tls-cbc.txt
> >> http://vnhacker.blogspot.com/2011/09/beast.html
> >> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-006
> >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584
> >>
> >>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2012/01/21/fixing-the-beast.aspxData
> >> Received: Negotiated cipher suite: EDH-RSA-DES-
> >> CBC3-SHA|SSLv3|Kx=DH|Au=RSA|Enc=3DES(168)|Mac=SHA1 Resolution: Configure
> >> SSL/TLS servers to only use TLS 1.1 or TLS 1.2 if supported. Configure
> >> SSL/TLS servers to only support cipher suites that do not use block
> >> ciphers.
> >> Apply patches if available. Note that additional configuration may be
> >> required after the installation of the MS12-006 security update in
> order to
> >> enable the split-record countermeasure. See
> >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2643584 for details. Risk Factor:
> Medium/
> >> CVSS2 Base Score: 4.3 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) CVE: CVE-2011-3389
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This is supposed to explain it further:
> >> http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-3389
> >>
> >>
> >> What should I do? Should I modify the parameters in my Tomcat Connector?
> >> Should I upgrade my JVM? Should I upgrade Tomcat to a most recent
> version?
> >> Should I use Windows instead of Linux? (I'm joking with the last one!)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Some information you may need to answer this:
> >>
> >>
> >> - Linux Centos 5.8
> >> - I'm using an SSL certificate from geotrust, a very current one (as
> far as
> >> I know).
> >>
> >> - JVM: 1.6.0_11-b03
> >>
> >> - Tomcat 7.0.10 (Even though I disguised it as 7.0.25, actually so
> >> securitymetrics don't bother me with some very obscure vulnerabilities
> that
> >> would force me to update it otherwise)
> >>
> >> - This is the relevant entry in my server.xml file:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    <Connector
> >>
> >>        connectionTimeout="10000"
> >>
> >>        enableLookups="true"
> >>
> >>        port="8443"
> >>
> >>        scheme="https"
> >>
> >>        secure="true"
> >>
> >>        clientAuth="false"
> >>
> >>        keystoreFile="conf/certificate.kdb"
> >>
> >>        minSpareThreads="4"
> >>
> >>        maxThreads="1000"
> >>
> >>        sslProtocol="SSLv3"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ciphers="SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5,SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA,SSL_DHE_RSA_WITH_
> >> 3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA"
> >>
> >>        protocol="HTTP/1.1"
> >>
> >>        SSLEnabled="true">
> >>
> >>    </Connector>
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance!
> >>
> >>
> >> Brian
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to