Paul, you shouldn't top-post. It makes it hard to follow the logical gist of the
conversation.
2012/11/30 Hassan Schroeder <hassan.schroe...@gmail.com>:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Christopher Schultz
<ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
OP never posted the whole XML, so we don't know that it's definitely
not well-formed.
Good point -- should have asked for the whole file before jumping to
that conclusion. But it certainly looked sketchy :-)
--
Paul van Hoven wrote:
> Thank you guys for your great help. It was indeed an error in the xml
> that I entered in the server.xml file. I put something like this:
>
> <Server port="8005" shutdown="SHUTDOWN">
> ...
> <Service name="Catalina">
> ...
> <Engine name="Catalina" defaultHost="localhost">
> <Host name="localhost" appBase="webapps"
> unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="true">
> <Host name="www.my2nddomain.com"
> appBase="/opt/apache-tomcat-7.0.32/my2nddomain" unpackWARs="true"
> autoDeploy="true" xmlValidation="false" xmlNamespaceAware="false">
> </Host>
> </Host>
> </Engine>
> </Service>
> </Server>
>
> Notice that I nested the virtual host definition within the host
> definition tags of the default host. So, therefore it did not work and
> I didn't see it.
>
> Okay now it works perfectly fine. Again, thanks for your fantastic support!
So, taking into account Christoper's detailed explanation of why Tomcat would not detect
this as an error in server.xml, we are still left with something strange here.
Assuming that Paul previously reported the result correctly (he requested a URL mapping to
the first host, and got a response from an app of the second Host instead), that would
mean that in the process of parsing the above, Tomcat somehow overwrote the appBase of the
first <Host> tag, with the appBase of the second <Host> tag, no ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
