On 21/05/2013 19:47, Michael-O wrote: > Am 2013-05-21 20:38, schrieb Mark Thomas: >>> Seems like they understood the problem. But I do doubt that this is a >>> fixed size moemory leak. >> >> I think the point they are trying to make is that it is only the first >> instance of the web application to be unloaded that will be pinned in >> memory. Subsequent reloads won't trigger a leak. That is correct. > > Does this mean that only one WebAppClassLoader stays in memory because > the thread is launched once and attached to that class loader?
Exactly. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
