Right! .. I'll try to sort out why we've needed that to date.
Thx On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 21/08/2013 21:14, Raymond Auge wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I found an unanswered email from 2007 with the same question I'm about to > > ask > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-users/200711.mbox/%3C20738052.1370841195554493504.JavaMail.servlet%40kundenserver%3E > > > > Is there any option for dealing with permissions of web apps > > using antiResourceLocking / antiJARLocking? > > > > To quote: > > *"the numeric prefix (e.g. "1-") of the webapp copied to the temp folder > > eventually changes, for instance when I redeploy the webapp or when I > clear > > the temp directory. As a result, I always have to keep the > catalina.policy > > file up-to-date with the current prefix of the webapp, otherwise the > > permissions fail."* > > > > I believe the problem is due to the fact that the policy, being > configured > > ahead of time (i.e. startup only), cannot know the paths which will be > used > > in the temp folder later at runtime. > > > > I just wanted to put that out there again in case someone had actually > > thought more about it. > > Fix the bugs that cause you to need to use the anti-resource locking > features in the first place? > > Mark > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)
