All,
On 16/09/2013 10:52 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Felix,
On 9/16/13 10:25 AM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
Am Montag, den 16.09.2013, 10:02 -0400 schrieb Christopher
Schultz:
Jim,
On 9/16/13 3:42 AM, Jim Barber wrote:
I'm hoping someone on this list can help me since I've been
reading docs, mailing lists, FAQs, and so on for hours now, and
I'm not having much luck finding an answer to my question.
I am using Tomcat version 7.0.42 as packaged in Debian Linux.
In front of my Tomcat servers, I am using haproxy for load
balancing. The haproxy load balancers are using the HTTP
OPTIONS request method to check if the Tomcat servers are alive
and healthy.
This results in log entries like the following in the Tomcat
accesslog file:
10.122.32.4 - - [16/Sep/2013:17:12:49 +1000] "OPTIONS /
HTTP/1.0" 200 - 10.122.32.4 - - [16/Sep/2013:17:12:51 +1000]
"OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0" 200 - 10.122.32.4 - -
[16/Sep/2013:17:12:53 +1000] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0" 200 -
10.122.32.4 - - [16/Sep/2013:17:12:55 +1000] "OPTIONS /
HTTP/1.0" 200 - 10.122.32.4 - - [16/Sep/2013:17:12:57 +1000]
"OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0" 200 - 10.122.32.4 - -
[16/Sep/2013:17:12:59 +1000] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0" 200 -
10.122.32.4 - - [16/Sep/2013:17:13:01 +1000] "OPTIONS /
HTTP/1.0" 200 - 10.122.32.4 - - [16/Sep/2013:17:13:03 +1000]
"OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0" 200 - 10.122.32.4 - -
[16/Sep/2013:17:13:05 +1000] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0" 200 -
10.122.32.4 - - [16/Sep/2013:17:13:07 +1000] "OPTIONS /
HTTP/1.0" 200 - 10.122.32.4 - - [16/Sep/2013:17:13:09 +1000]
"OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0" 200 - 10.122.32.4 - -
[16/Sep/2013:17:13:11 +1000] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.0" 200 -
At the moment I'm getting one of these every 2seconds, but I
haven't enabled the second load balancer for HA purposes yet.
When I do that, I'll be getting twice as many hits of this
type.
This is going to result in rather large log files full of
noise that I'm not interested in.
Playing the devil's advocate here a bit...
Why wouldn't you be interested in getting these logs? They are
requests being handled by your web server. They require (a small
amount of) time and resources to process, and indicate that your
lb is still reaching-out to determine the status of the app
server.
My recommendation would be to leave those logs in there (they
accurately describe a real request) and filter them out if you
want to do some kind of analytics against your log files and
consider those OPTIONS requests to be noise.
I have had one case where I wanted to get rid of those requests
too, so I can understand the OP. But I have to admint I had a scary
feeling about it.
<Valve className="org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve"
directory="logs" prefix="localhost_access_log." suffix=".txt"
pattern="%h %l %u %t "%r" %s %b" />
Specifically adding the condition="<VALUE>" attribute, but I
have no idea what to set <VALUE> to.
It's not that simple: if you want to use "condition", then you
have a write a Valve (can't be a Filter, since it must run
*before* the AccessLogValve) that tests the request and sets a
request attribute that will then trigger this condition.
That is not true, you can use a filter, since the logging will
happen *after* the request and can and will check the request
attribute then.
Thanks for pointing that out. After I had sent my message, I realized
that and decided not to post a followup after reading yours.
- -chris
Thank you all for your responses.
It looks like I'll just have to put up with these messages.
There seems to be no easy way to filter them out.
Regards,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
