Hi,

In a privileged context, a have the following jsp to test a global jndi
resource:

<%@ page session="false" import="java.util.*,java.sql.*,javax.naming.*,
javax.sql.*,org.apache.commons.dbcp.*" contentType="text/html" %>
<%!

protected void doLookup(JspWriter out) throws ServletException, IOException
{
 Context ctx;
 try {
  ctx = new InitialContext();
  Object o = ctx.lookup("java:jdbc/cacheapp");
  out.println(o);


 } catch (NamingException e) {
  out.println(e.getMessage());
 } catch (Exception e) {
 }
 }

%>

<html>
<head>
  <title>Test JNDI</title>
</head>
<body>

<h1>Teste JNDI</h1>
<hr/>
<%
doLookup(out);
%>
<hr/>

</body>
</html>


Versions earlier than 6.0.41:

org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSource@29050dfd{ConnectionPool[defaultAutoCommit=null;
defaultReadOnly=null; defaultTransactionIsolation=-1; defaultCatalog=null;
driverClassName=com.intersys.jdbc.CacheDriver; maxActive=10; maxIdle=2;
minIdle=1; initialSize=10; maxWait=10000; testOnBorrow=true;
testOnReturn=false; timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis=5000;
numTestsPerEvictionRun=0; minEvictableIdleTimeMillis=60000;
testWhileIdle=false; testOnConnect=false; password=********;
url=jdbc:Cache://localhost:1972/USER; username=tomcat;
validationQuery=select 1 from dual; validationQueryTimeout=-1;
validatorClassName=null; validationInterval=0;
accessToUnderlyingConnectionAllowed=true; removeAbandoned=true;
removeAbandonedTimeout=300; logAbandoned=false; connectionProperties=null;
initSQL=null; jdbcInterceptors=null; jmxEnabled=true; fairQueue=true;
useEquals=true; abandonWhenPercentageFull=0; maxAge=0; useLock=false;
dataSource=null; dataSourceJNDI=null; suspectTimeout=0;
alternateUsernameAllowed=true; commitOnReturn=false;
rollbackOnReturn=false; useDisposableConnectionFacade=true;
logValidationErrors=false; propagateInterruptState=false;
ignoreExceptionOnPreLoad=false; }


6.0.41 and 7.0.55:

Name jdbc is not bound in this Context

That is a bug?


We are having a issue in psi-probe because this behavior change (
https://code.google.com/p/psi-probe/issues/detail?id=411).


Thanks in advance.

Reply via email to