Christopher Schultz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 4/1/15 7:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 01/04/2015 11:53, André Warnier wrote:
<snip/>
By curiosity, I was trying to find the relevant RFCs, to see if
"ä" is a valid name for a cookie. I am not sure..
Cookies are defined in RFC6265
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265). That document defines the
cookie-name as a "token", and refers to RFC2616 for the
definition of token. RFC2616
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-2.2) defines a
"token" as a series of CHAR's, which in turn are defined as
CHAR = <any US-ASCII character (octets 0 - 127)>
So that would tend to say that "ä" is not a valid name for a
cookie ?
The rules for cookie names are stricter than those for cookie
values. I believe the OP was asking about cookie values.
Nope:
On 4/1/15 5:38 AM, Peter Schroer wrote:
This can be easily tested by writing "document.cookie='ä=0';" in
the developer console of the browser.
So in this case, it's a cookie /name/, but a value.
huh ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
