Am 8. August 2015 14:11:11 MESZ, schrieb Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA256 > >Chinoy, > >On 8/5/15 4:39 AM, Chinoy Gupta wrote: >> When can we expect the release of JK 1.2.41 source code? > >Well, you can get your hands on it right now: svn trunk is always >available.
+1 > >Or you can wait for the vote to finish... I believe we have 3 votes to >release. But only two of them are binding. Sorry, Felix > >http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/evury5r6rwcls5df > >- -chris > >> -----Original Message----- From: Mark Thomas >> [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:16 PM To: >> Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> Subject: Re: AW: >> Question concerning mod_jk Security Fix CVE-2014-8111 >> >> On 20/07/2015 10:58, Kreuser, Peter wrote: >> >> <snip/> >> >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> I appreciate your open comment and that clarifies the lengthy >>> wait. I trust that now the solution gets going and will be solved >>> soonish. >>> >>> I'm in no position to criticize any wrongdoing on this CVE. I >>> only hope to find a clearer communication on the tomcat-security >>> sites in the future and if THAT is RedHat's fault, then please >>> clean up the process with them. >> >> I've just updated the JK security page on the Tomcat web site. >> >> To be clear, keeping this page up to date is entire the >> responsibility of the Tomcat committers. We dropped the ball on >> this one. That said, I had hoped - much like I hoped with the >> release - that RedHat would have directed one of their employees >> who is a committer to do the update. When that didn't happen pretty >> much immediately, we (the Tomcat committers) should have done it. >> >> I've read through the release docs and I should be able to get a >> 1.2.41 source release out. I'm planning on doing that next. Binary >> releases are going to have to wait for other folks to contribute >> them. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Mark >> >>> Thank You. Best regards, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> PS: is that the correct position to add my response? >> >> Yes, it was. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > >iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVxfHfAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYPy8P/jN1cMPMQNXF7HCL9x9VC2o0 >MoQK05eZ1EKj/hdI94kxr1Zz9tfFkm3Ud2XgMLIwexTpSwuIfkMRh4QREHGuAojO >sCzufygPc6Yb8Tf+HNDCi6GEqJy1SGB3inM4glgKWxuDugh+f8Kl+ZOKFBkeHeYV >Tjo900rLdQotxHI+RzUK/74Jua/He8Dtlne4XFoiCfpmqfIzwRtNmWJ2N9gWYpCn >fcpbQ0S4Hqw7YH6gzutDSgWiT/vlftx/5ynX9ybgSSFqVLsGmIxoTJMSot8/Rv0R >BlumYGTMfvf+NhzwCJSPab3xzcQsdYp8ObucuQp4FfKzh2i2R1VuT+cxZcuG04aT >69pE61DY6QOZUz6n8gCpzEaNTIYSA13ktS7qQQN1L2ik0HwapLaAx+xaIP7h58B1 >yS6Q2N8Lm2k5UOqIEO+Nev6ZwnYHLIb7rdllpJiia+4t9eLfFrMWE/It8Tg9WE7q >t+wi0YFZDV8iB4c/2IBSN2xEUBcasUzfj2M0QOPVkNblPVtKkH0C9tqzukPLXRG2 >VMtgpZwk1QWAPTi3Ghl1aKzhgvjGvzrrFfsLgxQDz4blg8TAzxuV1hn6pMUQxnsd >luxCMprIXUt5IL2UJejGnqLKKWUkXCuC0anxV9yQTMGWNr9CZlVKVJYEALPUJOLC >u5RWsrWcctsQauIZJQg0 >=GPIs >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
