Hi Thomas,

Connector configuration is like :
<Connector port="10004" protocol="AJP/1.3" redirectPort="8443" />

On 5 October 2015 at 14:17, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 05/10/2015 09:07, Yogesh Patel wrote:
> > Thanks Mark Thomas ,
> >
> >    Our application is access by Apache TO Tomcat using AJP Connector.
>
> OK. That answers one of the questions I asked. However, you haven't
> provided the connector configuration.
>
> >     Problem :
> >     Our application was mostly hanged,after looking at tomcat manager it
> > shown there are so many long running threads shown.
>
> The Tomcat Manager app does not show long running threads. It does show
> you how many requests are busy but again, a busy thread is not
> necessarily processing a request.
>
> >     We want to recognize why so many threads are running since long time.
>
> Threads are always "running". The key question is are those threads
> 'idle' or 'busy'. An idle thread is waiting to be allocated work. A busy
> thread has been allocated work but the manager application can't
> distinguish if that work is 'wait for a request to process' or
> 'processing a request'.
>
> >     We want to detect such thread and want to kill these stucked thread.
>
> You continue to make the (increasingly unlikely) assumption that 200
> busy threads mean you have 200 threads processing long running requests.
> Had you provided the connector configuration I asked for (by that I mean
> the <Connector ... /> elements in server.xml) then I'd be in a better
> position to tell you what is wrong.
>
> If you do have 200 long running requests then the
> StuckThreadDetectionValve is how you detect them. That fact that that
> valve is not reporting any long running requests should be a big clue
> that your assumptions about what is going on are not correct.
>
> If, and it is a big if, you did have 200 concurrent long running
> requests then there is no guaranteed way to stop them. If your
> application checks for interrupts (most don't) then the
> StuckThreadDetectionValve can interrupt them which should terminate the
> processing of that request but the time it would take to code the
> application to handle that properly would normally be better spent
> fixing the root cause of the long running request.
>
> Mark
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5 October 2015 at 13:11, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/10/2015 07:54, Yogesh Patel wrote:
> >>>         We are facing issues with long running thread in tomcat . we
> are
> >>> using Tomcat-7.0.47.Tomcat manager shows Current busy threads : 200,
> >>> application  gets stucked due to these long running threads.
> >>
> >> What makes you think you have issues with long running threads? A busy
> >> thread isn't necessarily processing a request. Configuration errors
> >> leading to thread starvation are a more typical cause of the symptom you
> >> describe rather than long running threads in the application.
> >>
> >>>          We implemented StuckThreadDetectionValve in server.xml( <Valve
> >>>
> >>>     className="org.apache.catalina.valves.StuckThreadDetectionValve"
> >>>
> >>>     threshold="60" />), but it  could not help out.
> >>
> >> Why not? Again, this suggests that long running threads aren't the
> problem.
> >>
> >>>        So we implemented custom StuckThreadDetectionValve by extending
> >>> StuckThreadDetectionValve from
> >>> catalina, it only goes to "constructor","initInternal",and in
> >> "invoke"(when
> >>> action fires), it does not go to function "getStuckThreadNames()" even
> >>> after threshold time.How to achieve the same.Is there any way to detect
> >>> stucked thread and kill them?
> >>
> >> First of all your invoke() method fails to call super.invoke() so the
> >> Valve is never going to do anything.
> >>
> >> Secondly, if the original valve didn't work adding a bunch of
> >> System.out.println() lines isn't going to magically make it work.
> >>
> >> Thirdly, getStuckThreadNames() is never called by any Tomcat code so it
> >> is no surprise that you never see a call to that method. That method is
> >> intended for use via JMX.
> >>
> >> I suggest you start again and tell us more about the problem you are
> >> trying to solve (lack of response) and your configuration. In particular
> >> we need to know your connector configuration and how users access the
> >> application. Do they connect directly to Tomcat or do they go via a
> >> reverse proxy?
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>   My custom Valve is like following :
> >>>
> >>> public class StuckThreadDetection extends StuckThreadDetectionValve
> >>> {
> >>> StuckThreadDetection stuckThreadDetection;
> >>>
> >>> public StuckThreadDetection()
> >>> {
> >>> System.out.println("in StuckThreadDetection constructor");
> >>>
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> public void invoke(Request request, Response response) throws
> >> IOException,
> >>> ServletException
> >>> {
> >>> System.out.println("in invoke...");
> >>>
> >>> getNext().invoke(request, response);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @Override
> >>> protected void initInternal() throws LifecycleException
> >>> {
> >>> System.out.println("In initInternal");
> >>> super.initInternal();
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @Override
> >>> public String[] getStuckThreadNames()
> >>> {
> >>> System.out.println("in getStuckThreadNames...");
> >>> String[] listStuckedThread = this.getStuckThreadNames();
> >>>
> >>> for (String threadName : listStuckedThread)
> >>> {
> >>> System.out.println(threadName);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> return listStuckedThread;
> >>>
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @Override
> >>> public String getInfo()
> >>> {
> >>> System.out.println("In getInfo");
> >>> return super.getInfo();
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>


-- 
*Thanks & Regards,*

* Yogesh Patel*

Reply via email to