Why do you depend on the context classloader inside that?

Op 1 dec. 2017 04:41 schreef "Xueheng Wu" <x...@thoughtworks.com>:

> Johan, thanks a lot.
>
> This way could be a huge project, because parallelStream is used
> everywhere.
> Maybe we got wrong usage from the beginning.
>
>
> > On 30 Nov 2017, at 19:23, Johan Compagner <jcompag...@servoy.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think tomcat has nothing todo with this.
> >
> > This is the Threadpool that parallelStream() uses. So this is a problem
> of the streaming api of java
> > The threadpool needs to set the context classloader on its created
> threads..
> > So you need to use i think your own ThreadPool, i think that is doable:
> >
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21163108/custom-
> thread-pool-in-java-8-parallel-stream/22269778#22269778 <
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21163108/custom-thread-pool-in-java-8-
> parallel-stream/22269778#22269778>
> >
> > On 30 November 2017 at 03:31, Xueheng Wu <x...@thoughtworks.com <mailto:
> x...@thoughtworks.com>> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >       I met a strange error these days, and need help.
> >
> >       Our application is running on Tomcat 8.5.11 (windows 10 64bit)with
> JRE 1.8.0_121.
> >
> >       In the application, we use parallelStream to do some logic, like
> this:
> >
> >
> >       There are many steps in the logic, and some of them use togglz,
> then we got error.
> >
> >       After checking togglz’s code, I found that it calls
> “Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader()” every times calling
> togglz.
> >
> >
> >       Then I print out context class loader when calling togglz, like
> this:
> >
> >
> >       And I find a strange thing. Only execute thread has context class
> loader, worker thread created by parallelStream got null for class loader.
> >
> >
> >
> >       But when it start as an springboot application, all threads has
> context class loader:
> >
> >
> >
> >       So please tell me why class loader got null and how to avoid it.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Johan Compagner
> > Servoy
>
>

Reply via email to