Several people now tried it and the code is much cleaner, so chances are very good, that the busy part is correct now. Of course, the version is not finally released now, so the user base of it is still pretty small.
If this is so important for you, you should neverthelese use some script to regularly call the jk manager (aka jk status) and extract the numbers that are relevant for you to some log file (e.g. busy number, error/stop/disable status, access numbers). That way you can regularly draw graphs from the numbers and get a feeling for the normal operating conditions of your system. Mohan2005 schrieb: > Dear Sir: > > I did this, recompiled and installed. > > Its working perfectly now. > Thanks for the help. > > Since this version has fixed the 2^32 - 1 number in Busy column, is it safe > to assume that the Busy number in the new version is dead accurate and can > be used as a load balancing method 'B' without any fear :-) ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
