Thanks for the quick fix :)

On 2022/02/28 16:47:20 Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> Thanks for the test, this is what I had in mind. As I kind of expected
> when reading about the sequential technique used, the previous fix was
> causing a new problem since the thread id was not reset until the full
> recycle, making the new check inaccurate as well in another scenario.
> The fix will be in the next round of monthly releases (9.0.60).
> Thanks !
> Rémy

Reply via email to