Done!

Fede.


On Wed, May 28, 2025, 14:05 Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:

> Federico,
>
> On 5/28/25 10:43 AM, federico bustamante wrote:
> > Excellent news, thank you for taking the time to make it work.
> > I tested it in 9.0.105 (using NIO2) , 10.1.41 and 11.0.7 on Windows and
> it
> > works fine.
> > On Chrome 136 the negotiated DH group is X25519MLKEM768, as expected.
> > I'll keep doing tests.
> >
>
> Please reply to the [VOTE] email on the development list with this
> feedback. We always appreciate community feedback on releases. You don't
> have to be a committer or PMC member or anything like that.
>
> -chris
>
> > On Wed, May 28, 2025, 04:51 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 27/05/2025 19:20, federico bustamante wrote:
> >>> Hi Mark, hope to find you well.
> >>> Just following up, did you get the build working?
> >>> I tried a few more times but I couldn't make any progress.
> >>
> >> Yes, all working. There is a Tomcat Native release in progress now with
> >> the Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 3.5.0.
> >>
> >> Details here:
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/5k3nv5ntmnrwfyz8tlywfldmpzbjdpcn
> >>
> >> Additional testing and feedback on that proposed release would be
> >> appreciated.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Fede
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 22, 2025, 08:22 federico bustamante <busta...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I couldn't make it work with mingw64.
> >>>> The switch to 3.5 LTS would be wonderful, I hope you can get the build
> >>>> working, Mark.
> >>>> Please keep us updated.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Fede.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, May 22, 2025, 07:07 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 22/05/2025 07:53, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>>>>> On 21/05/2025 23:04, federico bustamante wrote:
> >>>>>>> Yes, I don't have high hopes on make in it work on Ubuntu, but I
> >>>>>>> thought of
> >>>>>>> giving it a try using mingw-64.
> >>>>>>> I'll report back.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've been building the Tomcat Native binaries for Windows for a
> while.
> >>>>>> I'll try with 3.5 and report back.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This won't work with the currently documented Tomcat Native build
> >>>>> process for Windows
> >>>>> I'm working on some updates.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll also start a discussion on dev@ about switching the
> convenience
> >>>>>> builds to use OpenSSL 3.5 since that is the new LTS version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looks like we are heading towards consensus to do that - assuming I
> can
> >>>>> get the build working.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mark
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mark
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Fede
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2025, 18:20 Christopher Schultz <
> >>>>>>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Federico,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 5/21/25 2:22 PM, federico bustamante wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> I've only tried with OpenSSL 3.5, but I suspect it's the same
> story
> >>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>> older versions (which, to be honest, wouldn't bother me as much
> as
> >> it
> >>>>>>>> being
> >>>>>>>>> a specific problem with 3.5).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'll try reproducing the build process on Windows. We know the
> build
> >>>>> CAN
> >>>>>>>> be produced on Windows, because, well... we produce convenience
> >>>>> binaries
> >>>>>>>> for Windows with each tcnative release. But there may be some
> >>>>>>>> environmental nuances that aren't completely documented in our
> build
> >>>>>>>> process. We should fix that if it's the case.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'll try building the DLL on Ubuntu.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Strictly speaking, this is not possible. You may be able to build
> a
> >>>>>>>> Linux binary, but creating a Windows DLL on Linux would require
> that
> >>>>> you
> >>>>>>>> set up a toolchain that is much more complicated than just doing
> it
> >> on
> >>>>>>>> Windows in the first place.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -chris
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2025, 13:35 Christopher Schultz <
> >>>>>>>>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Federico,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/21/25 12:27 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Federico,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/21/25 10:58 AM, federico bustamante wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Did anyone have any luck building tcnative-2.dll with Openssl
> >> 3.5
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> add
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Post Quantum Cryptography support?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I tried following the steps in the wiki, but didn't have any
> >> luck
> >>>>>>>> (tried
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with cmake and nmake).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Have you been able to compile tcnative-2.dll with earlier
> >> versions
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>> OpenSSL? I'm asking to see if you are having trouble with
> >> building
> >>>>>>>>>>> tcnative in general, or if OpenSSL 3.5 is what is causing the
> >>>>>>>>>>> problem.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> FYI I just tried building libtcnative on MacOS against OpenSSL
> 3.5
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>> the build was successful. I believe the build process for
> Windows
> >>>>>>>>>> is ...
> >>>>>>>>>> complex compared to *NIX-style builds.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But I wanted to confirm that tcnative didn't have any issues
> with
> >>>>>>>>>> building against OpenSSL 3.5 in general, and that seems not to
> be
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> case.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So the problem must be with the Windows build process itself.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -chris
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to