Hi Chuck,

See my reply below.

Dan

From: Chuck Caldarale <n82...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 10:29 PM
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] How to access a REST service

> On 2025 Aug 13, at 20:27, Daniel Schwartz 
> <d...@danielgschwartz.com<mailto:d...@danielgschwartz.com>> wrote: > > Chris, 
> > > See my reply to your comment. > > Dan > -----Original Message----- > 
> From: Christopher Schultz 
> <ch...@christopherschultz.net<mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>>
NkdkJdXPPEBannerStart
Be Careful With This Message
From (Chuck Caldarale 
<n82...@gmail.com>)<https://godaddy1.cloud-protect.net/email-details/?k=k1&payload=53616c7465645f5fa98110f9f78623bc8099677906920df3d9bf0bc7620a029c68032ad953b6e292b42666fe10c749ab1316b2c67ff5f28b0acac4a4de02e79510f3cba6e49354f48b85ec42a339e28ec01e514e3c1a92c032a26bf4e674bcab96e2179aa20c69ea082d01ecc06485f35f7fb8e66270993d2062fdea52bfff06c26f17a34947d0887c654327ae6693d916a0fa58f477dac80cc32ddba49f588b23abbb7a5dda0378a2ede9514879e08c923706275c36485ba5a85bcc50f76f3a271e0ab40ac64b36bf6e374e709ade5b26f78e00213d91e80ab10aa32982a61289f9a0422e73a7e7298f94f1836de921>
Learn 
More<https://godaddy1.cloud-protect.net/email-details/?k=k1&payload=53616c7465645f5fa98110f9f78623bc8099677906920df3d9bf0bc7620a029c68032ad953b6e292b42666fe10c749ab1316b2c67ff5f28b0acac4a4de02e79510f3cba6e49354f48b85ec42a339e28ec01e514e3c1a92c032a26bf4e674bcab96e2179aa20c69ea082d01ecc06485f35f7fb8e66270993d2062fdea52bfff06c26f17a34947d0887c654327ae6693d916a0fa58f477dac80cc32ddba49f588b23abbb7a5dda0378a2ede9514879e08c923706275c36485ba5a85bcc50f76f3a271e0ab40ac64b36bf6e374e709ade5b26f78e00213d91e80ab10aa32982a61289f9a0422e73a7e7298f94f1836de921>
Potential Impersonation
The sender's identity could not be verified and someone may be impersonating 
the sender. Take caution when interacting with this message.

NkdkJdXPPEBannerEnd



> On 2025 Aug 13, at 20:27, Daniel Schwartz 
> <d...@danielgschwartz.com<mailto:d...@danielgschwartz.com>> wrote:

>

> Chris,

>

> See my reply to your comment.

>

> Dan

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Christopher Schultz 
> <ch...@christopherschultz.net<mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>>

> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 2:21 PM

> To: users@tomcat.apache.org<mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>

> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] RE: How to access a REST service

>

> Application servers don't work that way. A failed request stops the request, 
> not the application. If the JVM quits when you run out of connections, this 
> is a very unusual configuration you are running under.

>

> DGS: I think we miscommunicated.  Someone was suggesting that my problem was 
> that my Java program was throwing exceptions before it released the database 
> connections, but this can't be possible, because if an exception was being 
> thrown then either (1) the exception is caught and an error message is 
> printed out, and the program keeps running, or (2) the error is not caught 
> and the JVM outputs a stack trace and terminates.  Neither of these ever 
> happened, indicating that no exceptions are being thrown.  The only time the 
> program quits is when Glassfish can't make any further connections.  In this 
> case it is Glassfish that quits, not the JVM.





Uhhh - no. (BTW, the term “program” is rather ambiguous and really has little 
meaning in a servlet container environment,)



Exceptions can also be caught and swallowed, with or without logging them 
first. An uncaught exception results in termination of a single thread, not the 
entire JVM process (unless it’s the main thread). Tomcat goes to great lengths 
to catch any exception that servlet code doesn’t, and returns an appropriate 
status to the client that initiated the request that encountered the exception. 
Tomcat normally logs exceptions it catches to the webapp’s log file, not the 
console (or catalina.out). There has been the rare Tomcat bug where logging was 
inadvertently skipped.



I have no idea what Glassfish does with exceptions, but I would hope that a 
simple exception in a servlet running under Glassfish would not result in JVM 
termination - that would be really, really stupid and a violation of the 
servlet spec.



Not sure what you mean by “Glassfish quits, not the JVM” - if Glassfish exits, 
the JVM process terminates (unless Glassfish is being used in embedded mode). 
Do you mean that it’s Glassfish that detects the error and exits rather than 
the JVM aborting with, for example, a segfault ("access violation" in Windows)?



  - Chuck



DGS: You are talking above my head on this, but I’m not using any servlets, and 
the entire JVM process is the main thread.



DGS: Let me put this in context.  My system has two components, (1) a backend 
REST webservice written in Java and running in Glassfish, (2) a website written 
in Next.js that consumes the webservice. The Java program access a MySql 
database through the Glassfish pooling system.  But this is just an ordinary 
Java program running in a single thread.  If this throws an exception that is 
caught, then the code for the catch clause will output an error message, and if 
it throws an exception that is not caught, the JRE will output a stack trace 
and terminate.  You say that Glassfish will somehow “swallow” the exception and 
keep running.  I really don’t think so.  Maybe something like this will happen 
with servlets, but this is just an ordinary Java program, and this is how Java 
behaves.  It has nothing to do with Glassfish.











---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org<mailto:users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org>

For additional commands, e-mail: 
users-h...@tomcat.apache.org<mailto:users-h...@tomcat.apache.org>


Reply via email to