Hi, Since recently the name of the worker isn't necessary the same as the jvmRoute of the connected Tomcat instance. You can specify:
worker.foo.jvm_route=bar In the mod_jk logging these two names are used both, which causes some confusion. The requestlogging will used the jvm_route, while the error messages will use the name of the worker. E.g. JkRequestLogFormat "%R %r %s %T" [Mon Nov 13 00:01:46 2006] bar GET /tomcat/page HTTP/1.1 200 0.511555 and [Mon Nov 13 00:11:57 2006] [11751:0012] [info] service::jk_lb_worker.c (906): service failed, worker foo is in error state Could in the upcoming mod_jk 1.2.20 release this be changed to using the name of the worker also in the Request Logging. regards Henk Fictorie -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk---logging-the-name-of-the-worker-tf2621047.html#a7313837 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
