Jack wrote: > > Hello, > > My logic is: > > 1a. JSP is not supported by many web hosting companies > or is only supported in more expensive dedicated > server plans. In contrast, open source alternatives > such as php is well-supported by web hosting > companies. > -> Result: most small and medium sized > websites/webapps that do not need a dedicated server > use php. > 1b. JSP has many great features. But php is also very > powerful and has some capabilities that jsp doesn't > have. > -> Result: some heavy-traffic websites/webapps that > require dedicated servers use jsp. Some others use php > (eg. yahoo > [http://news.com.com/2100-1023-963937.html]). > -> 2. There are more php users than jsp users.
More website uses php -> more php users than jsp? One HSBC website alone counts millions of Java Servlet/JSP users. How about another mission-critical website in Hong Kong, PPS? Thus, as Java technology is the backbone of mission-critical services, the support and development will continue. John Mok --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
