-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris,
Chris Adams wrote: > Your empirical data really isn't useful, because it's based upon an > assumption that could very easily be false. Good point. Still, nobody has given any source for this information, so I'm inclined to consider it a myth for the time being. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFcFI59CaO5/Lv0PARAnv2AKCbGFFBFjP9+SO6t8PYeekKDNetuQCdGSMs a7vrxbsJKmssB8HX7aA1ndA= =oFZc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
