"dfelicia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Not true; see >><http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html> > > Interesting. I'll need to look into mod_proxy, further. But what about > performance? I've not tested it in a long while, but last I tried it was > slower that mod_jk. > > BTW, does Apache 2.2's new mod_proxy_ajp support encryption? Is that the > answer for me? (Yes, I know I have to RTFM... going there now.)
For the benifit of those searching the archives, what the fine manual says is that mod_proxy_ajp does not support encryption. The reason is that Tomcat currently does not support encryption. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possibe---mod_jk-%3C%3D%3DSSL%3D%3D%3E-AJP-1.3-tf2776640.html#a7763820 > Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
