-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew,
Andrew Miehs wrote: > If you need two devices load balancers to deal with your > current load, then you already have a problem. I was thinking from a failover standpoint, not so much a "too much load for a single piece of hardware" stance. These things should be able to handle more traffic that you can get through your pipe. > We run our BigIPs Active/Standby - and when the one BigIP dies, the other > takes over the 'VIPs' - virtual ips - from the other box. The one IP > address points to a floating address which is shared by the load balancer. That makes sense, and is more convenient than R-R DNS. My only experience with BigIP was that they were used at an unnamed registrar/SSL-cert provider as a contractor for about two years. The ops folks took care of all of that, leaving us to work on the actual software. > HA solutions work the same way, moving a floating addresses between the > multiple boxes... Sounds good to me. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF8BgQ9CaO5/Lv0PARAo0qAKCsRdJwWBJxKuVYwehoYLvzIzuL3ACdGBaw 1cjg4vXG+GI3u57liSf5T1g= =UyTV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
