if you are already using mod_proxy, why use AJP, mod_proxy in
particular, has a more solid implementation in HTTP than AJP
Filip
Mirko Viviani wrote:
Hi,
We are using Tomcat 5.5.20 with Apache 2.2.3/ssl/svn and jdk
1.6.0-b105 on a
Windows Server 2003 R2/SP1 SE with 4 Xeon cores and 4GB ram.
I have configured apache with a virtual host and the ProxyPass
directive to
redirect all the requests to the Tomcat instance, as in this example:
<VirtualHost 192.168.1.22:80 <http://192.168.1.22/>>
ServerName test.ourdomain
ServerAdmin mymail
ErrorLog logs/test-error.log
CustomLog logs/test-access.log common
<Location />
ProxyPass ajp://test.localhost:8009/
</Location>
</VirtualHost>
The same binaries and configurations work like a charm on a Win 2000
Pro/SP4
single processor test machine, with the only difference that the virtual
host is bound to * instead to a real ip address.
On the Win2003 server, after the first requests, the tomcat5 process
starts
eating 100% cpu on one core and saturate all the cpus after some
requests.
After that the APJ13 link starts loosing bytes requiring a service
restart.
An Apache restart releases the resources of the tomcat5 process.
Using a Redirect directive to the tomcat 8080 port instead of a ProxyPass
work correctly but it isn't the desired solution.
There are not antivirus or firewall/packet filter on the machines.
Any hints?
Thank you.
Mirko
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/745 - Release Date: 4/3/2007 12:48
PM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
