With some additional logging I found out that my problem is most
probably not related to the mixed request parameters.
It is a problem of synchronizing the decisions of whether to recycle
Request/Response objects and whether to recycle the processor.
I'll send more details in another mail with topic 'Comet: Unsufficiently
synchronized recycling decisions'.
Regards,
Matthias
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reich, Matthias
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:54 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Web application receives request parameters sent
> to another application on Tomcat 6
>
> Hi,
>
> I am experiencing a behavior that may be related to the
> mentioned problem.
>
> My Servlet uses the Comet interfaces of Tomcat 6.
> For debugging purposes, when my Servlet receives a BEGIN
> event, it stores a request counter in an atttribute of the
> HttpServletRequest object.
> (This is done to see in the logs to which request a
> subsequent READ, END or ERROR event is related.)
>
> Before setting the attribute, the servlet checks whether the
> attribute is already set:
>
> if (event.getEventType() == CometEvent.EventType.BEGIN)
> {
> HttpServletRequest request = event.getHttpServletRequest( );
> Long index = (Long) request.getAttribute(INDEX_ATTRIBUTE);
> if (index == null)
> {
> index = nextRequestIndex();
> request.setAttribute(INDEX_ATTRIBUTE, index);
> requestCount++;
> }
> else
> {
> myLogger.warn("Found old request attribute ("
> + index + ") in BEGIN event!");
> }
> ...
>
> When running tests where several requests are processed at
> the same time, I occasionally see the log message appear.
>
> It looks as if sometimes recycling of a request object is not
> yet completed when the object is already reused for a new request.
> I cannot tell if a similar behavior occurs in my tests also
> for request parameters because my tests don't pay much
> attention on the parameters.
>
> The 'old attributes' problem occurs as well with the APR
> connector as with the NIO connector, and I guess that also
> the 'wrong request parameters' problem only occurs with these
> two connectors, as they are prepared to handle Comet requests
> and therefore have a modified request processing (compared to
> the Http11Processor) also for 'regular' servlet requests.
>
> What connector are you using with Tomcat 6?
>
> If it is the APR connector (i.e. if you have the tcnative-1
> library in your library path), you could try if the problem
> disappears when you switch to the Http11Protocol.
>
>
> Matthias
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dejan Krsmanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 8:13 AM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: Web application receives request parameters sent
> > to another application on Tomcat 6
> >
> > I am aware of that. We are printing request parameters inside
> > Servlet's
> > doPost method.
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> > Len Popp wrote:
> > > It is possible that Tomcat resuses request objects. I'm
> not sure it
> > > does, but it might. For that reason, you're only allowed
> to use the
> > > request object in your servlet's doGet or doPost method, you can't
> > > stash it somewhere (e.g. in the HttpSession) and access it later.
> > > (This is mentioned in the servlet spec.) Of course I don't know if
> > > that's your problem, it's just something that came to mind.
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
