Hamster a écrit : > On 12/06/07, David Delbecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What's the point? Saving 2 Megs of hard disk space and, at the same >> time, risk to break deployed apps that sudeently get additionnal libs >> that can conflit in version with vendor supplied one? > > Don't ask me! > It is their request, they said something about security concerns, > fast security related libraries updated, etc... eh, do not ask ;( > > BTW I tried to use my own Loader in conf/context.xml it throws > exceptions... I will keep working ;] > > Oh, and here is why it is important for me: > If I will not be able to do that then they are going to put everything > in commons/lib and all applications will use same version of libraries > in shared classloader ;( and that is going to break all the apps ;] > and someone will have to "fix" or "upgrade" them to "the new > approach", and it's going to be me, not funny at all. > > > Hamster, > Stupid suggestion: What about one of those approach
1) revise war build process to force inclusion of libs 2) have a server lifecyclelistener that, before loading of a webapp, copy the concerned classes to the WEB-INF/lib ? Copy seems easier than play with classloader... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]