-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marcus,
Milanez, Marcus wrote: > I know that, but the code posted in the question had a CONFIDENTIAL > value set for <transport-guarantee> and the author still seemed to > have lacks regarding it... But just for a matter of curiosity, why > should I use another port for SSL, instead of 443 ? I'm not suggesting that you should use something other than 443 for HTTPS. Another poster suggested that you could simply check the port number. What I was saying was that running on port 443 does not guarantee a secure connection. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHH1Cg9CaO5/Lv0PARAqmsAJ0Xg8zq+YIa+LP1IRyI4G2yuyLCqgCfQYny BKDQrxOOpIkRTxFHx64cDyo= =vVLQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
