Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
> 
>>> Which version of mod_jk are you using?
>> ==> 2.2.6
> 
> No that's the httpd version. JK version should be 1.2.something.
> 
You are right, it is 1.2.25.


The default file normally doesn't get used. It's kind of template from
> which you can regenerate an original config. Whoever put the AddModule
> in there mixed up Apache 1.3 with 2.2, not a good sign :(

I talked to the person who put that configuration in the
~/default/httpd.conf file,
* see me muttering in myself *
The offending lines are now removed.


Minimum (assuming your jk module really sits in the correct moudules
> directory):
> 
> LoadModule       jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> JkLogFile        C:/wamp/logs/mod_jk.log
> JkLogLevel       info
> 
> plus (but better use a directory without spaces in the path, it doesn't
> have to be in the Tomcat directory):
> 
> JkWorkersFile    C:/Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Tomcat
> 6.0/conf/workers.properties
> 
You where right, the line containing JkWorkersFile generated an error:
Syntax error on line 499 of C:/wamp/bin/apache/apache2.2.6/conf/httpd.conf:
JkWorkersFile takes one argument, the name of a worker file for the Tomcat 
servlet containers
I changed the JkWorkersFile to:
JkWorkersFile    C:/wamp/conf/tomcat/workers.properties 

It works. Thanks for your help.

Abel
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Configuring-mod_jk--tp14384532p14398010.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to