Rainer Jung-3 wrote: > >>> Which version of mod_jk are you using? >> ==> 2.2.6 > > No that's the httpd version. JK version should be 1.2.something. > You are right, it is 1.2.25.
The default file normally doesn't get used. It's kind of template from > which you can regenerate an original config. Whoever put the AddModule > in there mixed up Apache 1.3 with 2.2, not a good sign :( I talked to the person who put that configuration in the ~/default/httpd.conf file, * see me muttering in myself * The offending lines are now removed. Minimum (assuming your jk module really sits in the correct moudules > directory): > > LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so > JkLogFile C:/wamp/logs/mod_jk.log > JkLogLevel info > > plus (but better use a directory without spaces in the path, it doesn't > have to be in the Tomcat directory): > > JkWorkersFile C:/Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Tomcat > 6.0/conf/workers.properties > You where right, the line containing JkWorkersFile generated an error: Syntax error on line 499 of C:/wamp/bin/apache/apache2.2.6/conf/httpd.conf: JkWorkersFile takes one argument, the name of a worker file for the Tomcat servlet containers I changed the JkWorkersFile to: JkWorkersFile C:/wamp/conf/tomcat/workers.properties It works. Thanks for your help. Abel -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Configuring-mod_jk--tp14384532p14398010.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]