Hi, Chris- I've used Comodo and don't remember any browser issues.
-Terence M. Bandoian > Subject: > Re: [OT] Comodo as a CA > From: > Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:40:23 -0400 > To: > Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> > To: > Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: > 1.0 > In-Reply-To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: > text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: > 7bit > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > Anyone? > Christopher Schultz wrote: > | All, > | > | I'm asking the Tomcat community this because everyone always surprises > | me with their wide customer experiences. > | > | I need to get new SSL certs for a domain name switch we're doing, soon. > | VeriSign's SGC/EV SSL certs are ridiculously expensive and so I'm > | looking for alternatives. Comodo offers a product that is > | indistinguishable (to me) to VeriSign's SGC/EV cert, but it costs 1/4 as > | much. > | > | Does anyone have any experience with Comodo? Specifically, has anyone > | run across any customers whose browsers do not trust Comodo as a CA? > | > | Thanks, > | -chris > - --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > iEYEARECAAYFAkgTMMcACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PASDgCePtVQFzSF9gFlphqc1HHWvh2O > fecAoIW7BC7ns5hqCBYnzj6aoH6cX0Co > =J9yo > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
