One is static (translation time) the other dynamic (runtime).
http://tinman.cs.gsu.edu/~raj/oracle10/web.1013/b14430/workjsp.htm
On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Jonathan Mast wrote:
I don't think they are exactly the same. I had something that was not
working with <jsp:include> but did for <%@ include %>.
I understand <jsp:...> this the new, XML-complaint way to do
things, but
there must be subtle differences in how things are being done
between these
2 approaches.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Andrei Tchijov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
they are identical. you will want to use <jsp:include> if you care
to have
your JSP pages in form of valid XML.
On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:52 , Jonathan Mast wrote:
I'm wondering if the <%@ include file="somefile.jsp" %> method of
including
a file is more error prone (on Tomcat) than <jsp:include
page="somefile.jsp"
flush="true"/> approach?
Any ideas would helpful, especially an explanation of what is
being done
under the hood when these 2 mechanisms are being invoked.
Tomcat 5.5
Java 1.4.2
Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
