Annony Mouse wrote:
Thank you very much for the fast and detailed response. It is very
reassuring to understand how the attack would actually work, and even
better that it is more limited in scope than I had feared.
On 6/3/08, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
7.) Communications failure can only mean one thing...
Oops. Sorry. Star wars quote (accidentally mis-quoted) to lighten the
tone failed.
"A communications disruption can mean only one thing: invasion!"
Sorry - I thought there was something about it but couldn't see what it
was. I should have seen that one. In my defence it is late in the UK ;)
I find the system to work very well indeed, and my thanks to all at
Tomcat and Apache for this as well. As one post I saw mentioned: if
Tomcat had a truly significant security flaw, this users group would
be awash with hundreds of requests for clarification in moments.
Thanks again
You're welcome.
Mark
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
